高级检索

    主要DEM数据在陕西省水土流失动态监测中的适宜性分析

    Suitability analysis of main DEM data for the dynamic monitoring of soil erosion in Shaanxi province

    • 摘要: 自2018年以来, 水利部开展了覆盖全国的水土流失动态监测工作。截至目前, 已获得3期全国范围内水土流失动态监测成果, 并公开发布。在水力侵蚀地区, 该项工作通过获取7个因子数据, 采用中国土壤流失通用方程(CSLE)计算区域内当年土壤侵蚀强度, 同时利用坡度、盖度、土壤侵蚀强度对各类信息进行分级统计。目前陕西省在开展本省省级监测区水土流失动态监测工作时所采用的地形因子(坡度、坡长)数据与1∶5万地形图在坡度分级上存在一定偏差, 导致区域土壤侵蚀强度与部分统计成果存在异常。以西安市长安区为例, 分别以SRTM1、NASADEM、ASTER GDEM较为常用的DEM数据源与1∶5万地形图在坡度分级上进行偏差分析, 结果表明: SRTM1生成的坡度数据与1∶5万地形图数据偏差最低, 且空间分布上明显优于NASADEM和GDEM数据, 较真实地反映区域内地形信息。为保证水土流失动态监测工作中间成果的合理性, 使其更能客观反映区域内水土流失情况, 推荐将SRTM1数据作为陕西省省级动态监测基础地形数据参与侵蚀计算与统计。

       

      Abstract:
      Background Since 2018, Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China has been doing dynamic monitoring of soil erosion across the country. Up to now, three phases of national dynamic soil erosion monitoring results have been obtained and released publicly. By obtaining seven factor data in the water erosion area, calculating the amount of soil erosion in the current year with the China Soil Loss Equation (CSLE; A=RKLSBET), we carried out a graded statistical analysis of various types of information at six levels: slight, mild, moderate, strong, extremely strong, and severe. At present, the topographic factor (slope, and slope length) data used in the dynamic monitoring of soil erosion in the provincial monitoring areas of Shaanxi province and the 1∶50 000 topographic map have certain deviation in the slope classification, especially in that of plain areas. The graded slope cannot accurately reflect the topographical features, and this will affect, to varying degrees, various data classified by the slope.
      Methods Taking Chang'an district of Xi'an as an example, we took the three commonly used DEM data of SRTM1, NASADEM and ASTER GDEM to perform a spatial calibration with the grid DEM generated by the elevation points and contour of a 1∶50 000 topographic map, which was followed by a fill-in analysis on these 4 kinds of DEM data, and generation of 6 grades of slope classification maps (< 5, ≥5°-8°, ≥8°-15°, ≥15°-25°, ≥25°-35°, and ≥35°). Finally, the 3 slope classification maps of SRTM1, NASADEM, ASTER GDEM and that of the grid DEM were used for deviation analysis.
      Results Compared with the grid DEM, the deviation of SRTM1 is the slightest of the three in spatial distribution, and is more accurate in reflecting the topographic information in the area. By SRTM1, the maximum deviation of the proportion of slope classification in plain areas was 1.15%, and that in mountainous areas was -4.80%. In contrast to this, the deviations of the other two DEM data in the proportion of slopes above 35° in mountainous areas were lower than -16%, which, obviously, cannot reflect accurately the distribution of high-grade slopes in mountainous areas.
      Conculsions The findings of the present study show that in the observed area, the STRM1 DEM is superior to the other two types of DEM data in terms of the degree of deviation of the slope classification ratio and the accuracy of spatial distribution. The data could be used as the basic topographic data for dynamic monitoring in Shaanxi province, specifically for various statistical analysis involving slope information, the calculation of soil erosion intensity, and objective and accurate reflection of the situation of soil erosion in the area.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回