高级检索

    流域泥沙入河负荷辨识方法

    Identification methods of sediment export load from watershed

    • 摘要: 探讨适宜的确定甘蔗地侵蚀泥沙入河负荷的方法,对甘蔗种植区防控土壤侵蚀、合理选择水土保持措施具有重要意义。选择广西甘蔗种植小流域作为研究区,将特定单体化合物稳定性同位素技术(CSSI)分别与实地监测、7Be示踪、RUSLE模型联合应用,确定流域甘蔗地侵蚀泥沙的入河负荷。结果说明:1)那辣流域中,甘蔗地侵蚀泥沙的贡献比例在24.5% ~ 42.8%之间,是入河泥沙的主要贡献来源之一;2)次降雨事件下,3种方法测定的流域土壤流失量在0.18 ~ 5.57 t/hm2之间,不同方法测定的流域土壤流失量大小排序为:7Be示踪>RUSLE模型>监测法;3)监测-CSSI法确定的甘蔗地泥沙入河负荷在0.04 ~ 1.07 t/hm2之间,与其结果相比较,7Be-CSSI法的相对误差为2.74% ~ 1672.63%,Nash-Sutcliffe系数E为–1.47;RUSLE-CSSI法的相对误差在–16.42% ~ 208.41%之间,E值为0.80。RUSLE-CSSI法比7Be-CSSI法定量辨识甘蔗地侵蚀泥沙入河负荷的结果与监测-CSSI法的实测值相比,误差均较大。因此,2种方法均不适用于确定流域泥沙入河负荷。

       

      Abstract:
      Background The sugarcane planting area expanded to the hilly land, which intensified the soil erosion intensity in the sugarcane plantation area of Guangxi. Driven by rainfall and runoff, eroding sediment and nutrients into the water, causing serious environmental pollution. However, there are few methods to determine the eroded sediment from sugarcane fields into river. Therefore, determining the appropriate method to the eroding sediment export load from sugarcane fields, which is of great significance to control soil erosion and select the reasonable soil and water conservation measures in sugarcane growth regions.
      Methods In this study, a small sugarcane growing watershed in Guangxi was selected to determine the proportion of sugarcane eroding sediment contribution based on Compound Specific Stable Isotopes (CSSI). Soil loss were determined by field monitoring, 7Be tracer technique and RUSLE model under three heavy rainfall events during the early sugarcane planting period in 2020-2021. Sediment export load from sugarcane land were estimated by combinative use of field monitoring, 7Be tracer technique, RUSLE model and CSSI techniques, respectively.
      Results 1) Eroding sediment from sugarcane land contributed 24.5% to 42.8% in Nala watershed, which was one of the main source of sediment into the river. 2) Soil loss measured by the three methods ranged from 0.18 to 5.57 t/hm2 under single rainfall event in the order of 7Be technique > RUSLE > Monitoring. 3) Sediment export load from sugarcane was between 0.04 and 1.07 t/hm2 determined by Monitoring-CSSI method. Compared with the results of Monitoring-CSSI method, the relative error of 7Be-CSSI method was 2.74% to 1672.63%, Nash-Sutcliffe (E) coefficient was –1.47. The relative error of RUSLE-CSSI method ranged from –16.42% to 208.41%, and E value was 0.8.
      Conclusions Compared with the export load from sugarcane land measured by monitoring-CSSI method, the results of 7Be-CSSI method and RUSLE-CSSI method both have large error. Thus, those two methods are unsuitable for determining sediment export load from watershed.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回