高级检索

    土壤混掺生物炭对微咸水入渗特性及水盐分布特征的影响

    Effects of biochar addition on the infiltration, water and salt distribution of soil irrigated with brackish water

    • 摘要: 土壤持水能力下降是引起水土流失的主要原因, 也是导致土壤质量下降、生态环境恶化和限制农业可持续发展的主要威胁。将具有强吸附特性和土壤改良作用的生物炭与微咸水灌溉相结合, 探求生物炭混掺对微咸水入渗特性及水盐分布特征的影响。进行离心机试验和室内一维垂直土柱试验, 设置4个生物炭混掺量(0、1%、2%和4%)和4个微咸水矿化度(0、1、3和5 g/L), 分析土壤水分特征曲线、累计入渗量、湿润锋运移距离和土壤水盐分布的变化规律。结果表明: 1)微咸水和生物炭混掺可以提高土壤的持水能力, Van-Genuchten模型能够对不同处理的土壤水分特征曲线进行准确描述; 2)微咸水和生物炭混掺均可提高土壤的入渗能力。无生物炭混掺时, 矿化度为3 g/L的微咸水处理入渗历时最短。在微咸水入渗条件下, 生物炭混掺量为2%处理入渗历时最短; 3)随着微咸水矿化度和生物炭混掺量的增加, 土壤平均质量含水率明显增加; 当生物炭质量比例为2%时, 土壤持水能力增强, 土壤平均质量含水率为各处理最大; 生物炭混掺量达到4%时, 出现对土壤中盐离子的吸附现象。

       

      Abstract:
      Background There are abundant brackish water resources in China, and the use of brackish water for irrigation poses a great danger to soil quality and sustainable use. Salinization has been a major threat to soil quality deterioration and sustainable agricultural development in arid and semi-arid regions. Combining biochar, which has strong adsorption properties and soil improvement effects, with brackish water irrigation and using brackish water resources in a scientific and rational manner is of great significance to alleviate water shortages and achieve sustainable agricultural development.
      Methods 4 biochar blends(0, 1%, 2% and 4%) and 4 water mineralization levels(0, 1, 3 and 5 g/L) were set. Soil moisture characteristic curves were measured by centrifuge method and fitted with Van-Genuchten model to analyze the soil moisture characteristic curves. The transport distance between the marsupial readings and the wetting front of soil column was recorded by indoor one-dimensional vertical constant head infiltration test, and the relationship between cumulative infiltration and time was fitted with Kostiakov model, and the relationship between the transport distance of wetting front and time was fitted with power function.
      Results 1) The volumetric water content of soil treated with 2% biochar was greatest when the mineralization of brackish water was 0. The volumetric water content of soil treated with 0 biochar was greatest when the mineralization of brackish water was 1, 3 and 5 g/L. The soil moisture characteristic curves of different treatments could be accurately described using the Van-Genuchten model, with R2 > 0.98. 2) In the same period, the cumulative infiltration time for each treatment was less than that of the control treatment. The length of infiltration time was 4% < 2% < 1% < 0 for brackish water mineralization of 0, and 2% < 4% < 1% < 0 for brackish water mineralization of 1, 3 and 5 g/L. The cumulative infiltration was described by the Kostiakov model with R2> 0.97. 3) Biochar significantly increased the transport distance of wetting fronts. When the mineralization of brackish water was 0, the shortest time was required to treat the transport distance of wetting front with 4% biochar; when the mineralization of brackish water was 1, 3 and 5 g/L, the shortest time was required to treat the transport distance of wetting front with 2% biochar. The transport distance of wetting front can be described by a power function with R2 > 0.99. 4)Biochar significantly increased the mean mass water content of the soil, but it increased and then decreased, with the peak occurring in the 2% treatment; the soil conductivity increased with the increase of biochar, and the most significant effect of salt adsorption in the soil was observed in the 4% treatment of biochar.
      Conclusions The combined use of biochar and brackish water can help alleviate the contradiction between water supply and demand. Biochar can significantly improve the water-holding capacity of the soil and has a strong adsorption effect on salt ions in the soil, improving the distribution of soil water and salt and effectively alleviating the problem of land salinization.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回