高级检索

    基于能值分析的靖边县典型淤地坝效益评价

    Evaluation on the effectiveness of typical silt dam in Jingbian county based on the emergy analysis

    • 摘要: 淤地坝是水土保持重要工程措施之一,具有良好的经济效益和社会效益。因此,量化评价典型淤地坝蓄水后的运行能够带来多大的效益十分重要。本研究对陕北靖边县淤地坝蓄水后的效益开展合理评价,以该县的大、中型典型淤地坝为研究系统,收集2018—2022年期间该县的统计年鉴、水资源公报以及野外调研等数据,基于能值分析方法,在典型淤地坝蓄水后的可更新资源能值(R)、不可更新资源能值(N)、输入能值(I)和输出能值(O)指标计算的基础上,对能值投资率(EIR)、净能值产出率(EYR)、环境负载率(ELR)和可持续发展指数(ESI)进行评价。研究结果表明:各种效益高低依次为灌溉效益、拦泥效益、淤地效益、养殖效益、防洪效益。从EIR结果来看,研究系统发展水平总体上呈上升趋势;从EYR结果来看,研究系统在对能值进行一定程度的补充投入后,仍然存在盈余,研究系统表现出较强的竞争力;从ELR结果来看,研究系统的运行对当地生态环境总体上影响较低;从ESI结果来看,ESI值 < 1,表明研究系统更依赖输入能值的投入,与生态环境的协调发展有待提高。

       

      Abstract:
      Background As an important engineering measure for soil and water conservation and ecological construction, silt dam has good economic and social benefits. Therefore, it is very important to quantify the benefits of operating silt dam after water storage.
      Methods This paper takes the large and medium-sized typical silt dam after water storage in Jingbian county as the research system, collects data from the statistical yearbook, water resources bulletin, and field research from 2018 to 2022, and analyzes the emergy streams of the research system based on the emergy analysis method (renewable resource emergy R, non-renewable resource emergy N, input emergy I, and output emergy O) as well as the four indexes (emergy investment ratio (EIR), net emergy output ratio (EYR), environmental load ratio (ELR), and sustainability index (ESI)) were evaluated.
      Results 1) The output emergy O of the research system in 2018-2022 was (4.57 − 5.46) × 1019 sej, of which the emergy of mud retention benefit was (0.99 − 1.85) × 1019 sej, accounting for 21.77% − 33.94%; the emergy of flood control benefit was (1.20 − 1.53) × 1018 sej, accounting for 2.36% − 2.81%; siltation benefit emergy was (2.19 − 2.57) × 1018 sej, accounting for (4.55% − 5.62%; irrigation benefit emergy was (2.82 − 3.09) × 1019 sej, accounting for (53.80 − 67.50)%; and farming benefit emergy was (0.89 − 2.94) × 1018 sej, accounting for 1.92% − 5.76%. 2) From 2018 to 2022, the EIR was 1.2544 to 1.5515; the EYR was 1.6445 to 1.7972, which were in the reasonable range of 1 to 6; the ELR was 1.9261 to 2.3365, which were all less than 3; the ESI was 0.7109 to 0.9331, which were all < 1.
      Conclusions From the EYR results, the development level of the research system is generally on an upward trend, and the output emergy after compensating emergy inputs is still surplus and shows strong competitiveness; from the ELR results, the operation of the research system has a low impact on the local ecological environment in general; from the ESI results, which indicates that the research system is more dependent on the input of input emergy, and the harmonization with the ecological environment needs to be improved.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回