高级检索

    向家坝水电站生态修复边坡团聚体稳定性研究

    Stability of soil aggregates on slopes with different ecological restoration at Xiangjiaba Hydropower Station

    • 摘要: 向家坝水电站位于金沙江下游干热河谷地区,地形崎岖,降雨量较大且集中,加剧了土壤侵蚀和退化。为研究边坡生态修复对土壤团聚体稳定性的影响,揭示干热河谷地区土壤团聚体的主要失稳机制,选取向家坝水电站植被混凝土(CBS)、框格梁(FB)、客土喷播(SS)、厚层基材(TBS)、天然林(NF)和弃渣地(AS) 6个边坡土壤,采用干筛法和Le Bissonnais(LB) 法、中快速湿润( FW) 、慢速湿润( SW) 和机械振荡( WS) 3 种方式,对比分析各边坡土壤的团聚体粒径分布、平均质量直径(MWD)、几何平均直径、土壤可蚀性K值特征。结果表明:干筛后,CBS、SS、AS > 0.25 mm粒径的团聚体质量分数均 > 90.00%,TBS和FB的均 > 85.00%,NF的较低,仅有75.78%。LB法处理后,MWD值除AS外变化趋势均为SW > WS > FW。3种处理下NF的K值均为最大。CBS、SS和AS大粒径团聚体质量分数较高,3种处理下 > 2.00 mm粒径的团聚体质量分数分别为55.53%、60.96%和56.15%;TBS和FB的次之,质量分数分别为40.03%和46.24%;NF的最小仅占36.84%。在本研究选取的4个生态修复样地中,SS水土保持效果最差,TBS最佳;大雨或暴雨产生的土壤孔隙中的气泡爆破产生的消散作用对生态修复边坡土壤团聚体的破坏最大。

       

      Abstract:
      Background The Xingjiaba Hydropower Station is situated in the arid and semi-arid valley region of the lower Jinsha River, which is characterized by rugged terrain and a high concentration of rainfall. These conditions contribute to increased soil erosion and degradation. This study aims to investigate the impact of slope ecological restoration on soil aggregate stability and to uncover the primary mechanisms behind soil aggregate destabilization in arid valley regions, thereby providing a deeper understanding of the processes involved.
      Methods Soils on 6 slopes with vegetated concrete (CBS), frame lattice beam mulching (FB), guest soil spraying (SS), thick layer substrate spraying (TBS), natural forest (NF), and disposal site (AS) of Xiangjiaba Hydropower Station were subjected to three treatments of pre-wetting and post-disturbance (WS), fast wetting (FW), and slow wetting (SW) by using the dry sieving method and the Le Bissonnais (LB) method, and the distribution of agglomerates, average weight, diameter, geometric mean diameter, and erodibility K characteristics were comparatively analyzed for the soils of each slope under different treatments.
      Results 1) After dry sieving, the percentage of aggregates with a particle size > 0.25 mm was > 90.00% for CBS, SS and AS, higher than 85.00% for TBS and FB, and lower than 75.78% for NF. The percentage of large aggregates was higher for CBS, SS and AS after the LB method, with the percentages of aggregates with a particle size of 2.00 mm under the three treatments being 55.53%, 60.96% and 56.15%, respectively. 55.53%, 60.96% and 56.15% > 2.00 mm particle size, respectively; the proportions of aggregates in TBS and FB were 40.03% and 46.24%, respectively, while NF was only 75.24%. The percentage of aggregates in TBS and FB was 40.03% and 46.24%, respectively; NF was only 75.24% and 46.24%; and NF was the smallest, only 36.84%. 2) Under the LB method, the MWD values except AS were SW > WS > FW, and the MSW values were distributed in the range of 2.16 – 3.26 mm. the MFW values were distributed in the range of 1.56–2.71 mm. the MWS values were distributed in the range of 2.10 – 3.03 mm. the GMD behaved similarly to the MWD. GMD behaved similarly to MWD values, with values ranging from 1.15 – 2.38, 1.10 – 2.07, and 0.73 – 1.85, respectively. 3) The K values under the three treatments ranged from 0.01900.0330, 0.02200.0480, and 0.02000.0333, with the overall performance of FW > WS > SW, and the K values of the NF under the three treatments being the largest. RSI (28.11 – 2.25) exhibited all were much larger than RMI (10.92 – 0.40).
      Conclusions The dissipation effect of bubble bursting in the soil pores produced by heavy rain or torrential rainfall has the greatest damage to the ecological restoration of the soil aggregates on the side slopes; due to the special topography of the site and the rainfall conditions, the LB method is not completely applicable to this site, and the experimental results should be considered in conjunction with the field conditions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回