高级检索

    科尔沁沙地输电塔基植被恢复区四种灌木林地上和地下碳库分配格局

    Aboveground and belowground carbon stocks in semi-arid revegetated shrub plantations within the vegetation restoration area of transmission tower bases in the Kerqin Desert

    • 摘要: 干旱区植被恢复是应对荒漠化和沙化的关键措施,其中灌木种植作为提高区域生态稳定性和碳汇功能的重要手段。科尔沁沙地作为我国北方典型的干旱区,植被恢复工程已显著改善其生态环境。然而,不同灌木林地在碳库分配及碳汇功能上的差异尚缺乏系统研究。本研究选取科尔沁沙地输电塔基植被恢复区四种灌木林地(盐蒿Artemisia halodendron、山竹岩黄芪Corethrodendron fruticosum、小叶锦鸡儿Caragana microphylla、黄柳Salix gordejevii),系统分析了其地上和地下生物量碳、土壤有机碳与无机碳的垂直分布特征及其主要影响因子。结果表明,四种灌木的地上生物量碳和根系生物量碳存在显著差异,沙柳林地生物量碳储量最高(2233.48±116.70 g m?2),而盐蒿的根系生物量碳最低(422.43±10.96 g m?2)。除山竹岩黄芪外,其他灌木林地地上生物量碳都显著高于根系生物量碳。土壤碳储量方面,盐蒿林地的有机碳(249.44±14.58 g m?2)和无机碳(750.99±33.37 g m?2)储量均为最高,而小叶锦鸡儿和沙柳林地的碳储量较低。与附近裸地相比,灌木林地的有机碳和无机碳储量均显著增加,分别增加了66.20?254.57%和35.30?146.45%。土壤碳储量随土壤深度增加呈下降趋势,但浅层土壤(0?40 cm)中的有机碳占比高达42.74?49.87%。相关性分析表明,土壤碳储量与微生物量碳、微生物量氮、碱性磷酸酶、β-葡萄糖苷酶等土壤微生物指标显著相关,但与根系生物量碳无显著关系。结果表明,植被恢复能有效增加土壤碳储量,且微生物活动在土壤碳转化和积累过程中起到关键作用。本研究为干旱区碳封存和土壤质量提升提供了重要的科学依据和实践支持。

       

      Abstract: Background Vegetation restoration in arid regions is a key strategy to combat desertification and land degradation, with shrub planting playing a crucial role in enhancing regional ecological stability and carbon sequestration. The Kerqin Desert, located in the northern part of China, is a typical arid region where vegetation restoration efforts have significantly improved the ecological environment. However, there is a lack of systematic research on the differences in carbon pool distribution and carbon sequestration functions across different shrublands. Methods This study selected four shrub species (Artemisia halodendron, Corethrodendron fruticosum, Caragana microphylla, and Salix gordejevii) from the vegetation restoration area around the transmission tower bases in the Kerqin Desert to systematically analyze the vertical distribution characteristics of aboveground and belowground biomass carbon, soil organic carbon, and inorganic carbon, along with their main influencing factors. Results The results showed significant differences in both aboveground and root biomass carbon across the four shrub species. The highest biomass carbon was found in the S. gordejevii plantations (2233.48±116.70 g m?2), while the lowest root biomass carbon was observed in the A. halodendron plantations (422.43±10.96 g m?2). Except for C. fruticosum, the aboveground biomass carbon in the other shrublands was significantly higher than the root biomass carbon. In terms of soil carbon storage, A. halodendron had the highest organic carbon (249.44±14.58 g m?2) and inorganic carbon (750.99±33.37 g m?2) content, while C. microphylla and S. gordejevii exhibited lower carbon storage. Compared to nearby bare land, the soil organic and inorganic carbon storage in shrublands increased significantly, with increases of 66.20?254.57% for organic carbon and 35.30?146.45% for inorganic carbon. The soil carbon storage decreased with increasing soil depth, with organic carbon accounting for 42.74?49.87% of the total in the shallow soil layer (0?40 cm). Correlation analysis indicated that soil carbon storage was significantly correlated with microbial biomass carbon, microbial biomass nitrogen, alkaline phosphatase, β-glucosidase, but showed no significant correlation with root biomass carbon. Conclusions These findings suggest that vegetation restoration effectively increases soil carbon storage, with microbial activity playing a key role in soil carbon transformation and accumulation. This study provides important scientific and practical support for carbon sequestration and soil quality improvement in arid regions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回