高级检索

    水土保持碳汇项目的基线问题

    The baseline issues of soil and water conservation carbon sink projects

    • 摘要:
      目的 我国积极推进水土保持碳汇纳入到国家自愿温室气体减排交易机制,科学合理设定该类碳汇项目基线情景是这项工作的关键。国内外通常将未实施项目措施时项目区碳储量的可能变化情况作为碳汇项目基线。这给水土保持碳汇项目的基线设置提供了基本思路。
      方法 基于国家CCER方法学征集要求和国际通用方法,探讨水土保持碳汇项目基线问题,阐述其定义、特性、分类方式和核心原则。并分析基线情景确定方法,针对项目固碳途径,详细阐述不同情形基线的设置方法,并结合典型措施应用实例说明。
      结果 1)通过严格基线调查设置的项目级基线是最具可行性。2)基于模型的预测可提高基准线一致性和透明度,但需校准且存在较大不确定性。3)区域或国家级基线可降低成本、简化论证,但缺乏地块代表性。4)提出“增绿增汇”“减蚀减排”“保土固碳”各固碳路径基线设置具体操作方法。5)通过案例展示实际应用。
      结论 项目级基线方法便于量化水土保持措施的碳汇效益;科学合理设置基线对于水土保持碳汇项目的开发并融入碳市场具有决定性作用;将水土保持碳汇项目纳入碳市场有益于气候变化减缓和可持续土地管理奠定基础。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective China is actively promoting the integration of soil and water conservation (SWC) carbon sinks into the national voluntary greenhouse gas emission reduction trading mechanism. Scientifically and reasonably setting the baseline scenarios for such carbon sequestration projects is crucial to this endeavor. Both domestically and internationally, the potential changes in carbon stocks in the project area without implementing project measures is commonly adopted as the baseline for carbon sequestration projects, which provides the fundamental approach for setting the baseline for SWC carbon sink projects.
      Methods Based on the requirements of China Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) methodology solicitation and internationally accepted practices, this study addressed the baseline issues for SWC carbon sink projects and elaborated their definition, characteristics, classification methods, and core principles. Additionally, methods for determining baseline scenarios were analyzed. Focusing on the carbon sequestration pathways of projects, the methods for setting baselines under different circumstances were elaborated in detail, and illustrated with application examples of typical measures.
      Results 1) The project-level baseline established through rigorous baseline surveys was the most feasible approach. 2) Model-based prediction could enhance baseline consistency and transparency but required calibration and exhibited significant uncertainty. 3) Regional or national baselines could reduce costs and simplify demonstration, yet they lacked site-level representativeness. 4) Specific operational methods were proposed for setting baselines for each carbon sequestration pathway,categorized as "Vegetation Carbon Stock Enhancement""Erosion Reduction and Carbon Emission Abatement" and "Soil Conservation and Carbon Fixation". 5) Practical application was demonstrated through case examples.
      Conclusions The project-level baseline method facilitates the quantification of the carbon sequestration benefits of SWC measures. The scientifically sound and appropriate setting of the baseline plays a decisive role in the development and integration of SWC carbon sink projects into the carbon market. Integrating SWC carbon sink projects into the carbon market contributes to climate change mitigation and lays a foundation for sustainable land management.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回