高级检索

    人工造林对冀北坝上沙地生态系统碳密度的影响

    The Impact of Afforestation on the Carbon Density of the Desert Ecosystem in North Hebei

    • 摘要: 目的为了明确冀北坝上沙地造林工程的碳汇作用,为该地区的植被建设提供理论依据。方法以御道口林场两种造林模式(林草间作、非林草间作)的樟子松人工林(Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)和华北落叶松人工林(Larix principis-rupprechtii)为研究对象,并以未造林地为对照(按生物量由高到低分为CKI、CKII和CKIII 3种类型),研究了不同造林树种和造林模式下生态系统碳密度的差异。结果研究发现:(1)各人工林生态系统碳密度均以乔木层和土壤层占有较大比例,草本层和凋落物层所占比例较小。(2)16-18a非林草间作的樟子松人工林(NFGP)和华北落叶松人工林(NFGL)乔木层碳密度分别为36.70 t/hm2和52.94 t/hm2,显著高于林草间作的樟子松人工林(FGP)(19.41 t/hm2)和华北落叶松人工林(FGL)(32.54 t/hm2)(p < 0.05);两种造林模式的华北落叶松人工林又显著高于樟子松人工林(p < 0.05)。(3)土壤层碳密度表现为CKI(127.56 t/hm2)> NFGL(110.55 t/hm2)> FGL(79.42 t/hm2)> FGP(76.85 t/hm2)> NFGP(63.07 t/hm2)> CKII(56.06 t/hm2)> CKIII(31.78 t/hm2),其中CKI与NFGL无显著差异,但两者均显著高于其他类型(p < 0.05),CKIII显著低于除CKII外的其他类型(p < 0.05)。(4)生态系统碳密度表现为NFGL(178.49 t/hm2)> CKI(132.70 t/hm2)> FGL(119.48 t/hm2)> NFGP(109.88 t/hm2)> FGP(102.01 t/hm2)> CKII(59.89 t/hm2)> CKIII(34.22 t/hm2),除NFGL显著高于其他类型、CKII和CKIII显著低于其他类型外(p < 0.05),其余类型之间均无显著差异(p > 0.05)。(5)实施“再造三个塞罕坝林场”工程以来,御道口地区通过人工造林增加碳储量115.54万t C。结论人工造林显著增加了冀北坝上沙地生态系统碳密度,使用华北落叶松采用非林草间作模式能够获得更高的碳储量;同时,初始植被较好且土壤有机碳储量较高时,使用樟子松进行人工造林或者两个树种采用林草间作模式可能会导致生态系统碳储量的下降。

       

      Abstract: Background Clarify the carbon sequestration effect of the afforestation project in the Bashang Plateau sandy land of northern Hebei Province to provide theoretical support for regional vegetation construction. Methods This study investigated the differences in ecosystem carbon density under different afforestation species and planting patterns, focusing on Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica and Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations with two afforestation models (intercropping of trees and grasses and non-intercropping) in Yudaokou Forest Farm. Non-forested lands served as controls, categorized into three types (CKI, CKII, and CKIII) based on descending biomass levels. Results The results showed that: (1) The carbon density within plantation ecosystems is predominantly distributed in the tree layer and soil layer, while the herbaceous layer and litter layer contribute a significantly smaller proportion. (2) The carbon density of the tree layer in the non-intercropping Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (NFGP) (36.70 t/hm2)and Larix principis-rupprechtii (NFGL) plantations(52.94 t/hm2) aged 16-18 years was significantly higher than that in the intercropping Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (FGP) (19.41 t/hm2) and Larix principis-rupprechtii (FGL) (32.54 t/hm2) plantations (p < 0.05). The Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations under both afforestation models were significantly higher than the Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations (p < 0.05). (3) The carbon density of the soil layer was in the order of CKI (127.56 t/hm2) > NFGL (110.55 t/hm2) > FGL (79.42 t/hm2) > FGP (76.85 t/hm2) > NFGP (63.07 t/hm2) > CKII (56.06 t/hm2) > CKIII (31.78 t/hm2). There was no significant difference between CKI and NFGL, but both were significantly higher than the other types (p < 0.05), and CKIII was significantly lower than the other types except CKII (p < 0.05). (4) The carbon density of the ecosystem was NFGL (178.49 t/hm²) > CKI (132.70 t/hm²) > FGL (119.48 t/hm²) > NFGP (109.88 t/hm²) > FGP (102.01 t/hm²) > CKII (59.89 t/hm²) > CKIII (34.22 t/hm²). Except for NFGL being significantly higher than the others and CKII and CKIII being significantly lower than the others (p < 0.05), there were no significant differences among the remaining types (p > 0.05). (5) Since the implementation of the "Recreate Three Saihanba Forest Farms" project, the Yudaokou area has increased its carbon storage by 1.1554 million tons of carbon through artificial afforestation. Conclusions Artificial afforestation has significantly increased the carbon storage of the sandy ecosystem in the northern part of Hebei Province, and using Larix principis-rupprechtii in a non-intercropping model can achieve higher carbon storage. Meanwhile, when the initial vegetation is good and the soil organic carbon storage is high, artificial afforestation with Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica or intercropping of the two tree species may lead to a decrease in the carbon storage of the ecosystem.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回