高级检索

    汾河流域近20年土壤侵蚀时空变化

    Spatial and temporal variations of soil erosion in the Fenhe River Basin over the past 20 years

    • 摘要:
      目的 汾河流域位于水土流失严重的黄河流域中游地区,尽管汾河流域近年来土壤侵蚀治理已取得显著成效,但侵蚀问题依然严峻,亟需掌握近年来时空格局及变化规律,为社会经济和生态环境可持续发展提供有力支撑。
      方法 基于CSLE模型估算2000—2023年汾河流域土壤侵蚀空间格局,采用地理信息演变图谱分析近20 a来流域土壤侵蚀时空差异性规律,并利用土地覆被采用耦合图谱法探讨土壤侵蚀时空变化的驱动因素。
      结果 汾河流域2000、2010和2023年非侵蚀比例均 > 50%,土壤侵蚀呈先改善后加剧的趋势,其中轻度侵蚀向非侵蚀的转化是流域土壤侵蚀改善的主要原因;然而,2010—2023年轻度侵蚀和中度侵蚀面积显著增加,造成部分区域侵蚀加剧;耕地非侵蚀面积比例最大,林地侵蚀面积中轻度侵蚀比例最大,而草地以轻度侵蚀为主;2000—2023年,土壤侵蚀演变类型以稳定型和波动稳定型为主,土壤侵蚀强度类型演变比较稳定,仅有不到0.05%的面积发生2次演变;土地覆被变化面积中,约有76.47%的面积土壤侵蚀出现改善,其中草地减少耕地增加比例最大。
      结论 根据上述汾河流域土壤侵蚀时空规律,汾河流域应持续强化坡耕地退耕后的水土流失防治工作,同时加强对覆盖度较低、垂直结构不完善的低效人工林以及退耕初期和弃耕后无人管理的林草地土壤侵蚀的监管力度。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective The Fenhe River Basin is situated in the central reaches of the Yellow River Basin, where soil erosion is a significant issue. Despite the notable advancements in soil erosion control in the Fenhe River Basin in recent years, the prevalence of severe erosion in certain regions persists. In order to provide strong support for the sustainable development of socio-economics and the ecological environment, it is urgent that we grasp the spatial and temporal patterns and variation characteristics.
      Methods Accordingly, this study estimated the spatial pattern of soil erosion in the Fenhe River Basin from 2000 to 2023 based on the CSLE model. The application of Geographic Information Evolution (GEO) mapping facilitated the analysis of spatial and temporal variability patterns of soil erosion in the watershed over the past 20 years, and the coupled mapping method was utilized to explore the drivers of spatial and temporal changes in soil erosion using land cover.
      Results 1) the proportion of non-eroded areas in the Fenhe River Basin exceeded 50% in 2000, 2010, and 2023. 2) The trend exhibited by soil erosion in the basin was one of initial improvement, followed by exacerbation. The primary factor contributing to the improvement in soil erosion was the conversion of mild erosion to non-erosion. However, from 2010 to 2023, the substantial increase in the areas of mild and moderate erosion resulted in the deterioration of erosion in certain regions. 3) The non-eroded areas constituted the largest proportion in cropland, while mild erosion accounted for the largest proportion in forestry, and grassland was primarily characterized by mild erosion. 4) From 2000 to 2023, the predominant types of soil erosion evolution were stable and fluctuating stable types. The soil erosion intensity evolution types remained relatively stable, with less than 0.05% of the area undergoing two evolution types. Among the areas that experienced changes in land cover, approximately 76.47% of the areas exhibited improvements in soil erosion, with the reduction in grassland and the increase in farmland accounting for the largest proportion of the improved areas.
      Conclusions Consequently, for the Fenhe River Basin, it is imperative to perpetuate endeavors to fortify soil and water conservation measures following the conversion of slope cropland. Moreover, there is a necessity to enhance oversight of soil erosion in low-coverage, poorly structured artificial forests characterized by incomplete vertical structures, as well as in forestry and grassland areas that have been abandoned subsequent to conversion or have been left unmanaged following abandonment.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回