高级检索

    不同掺量PAM和PVA对砂土与粉土物理性质及抗剪强度的影响

    Effects of different dosages of PAM and PVA on the physical properties and shear strengths of sandy soil and silty soil

    • 摘要: 为增强喷播基材客土层的稳定性,解决剥离、滑坡与水土流失问题,需明确黏合剂种类及掺量对基材性质的影响。本研究以砂土和粉土为对象,采用室内试验探讨聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)和聚乙烯醇(PVA)在0(对照组,CK)、0.2%、0.4%、0.6%、0.8%(w/w)掺量下对土壤密度、孔隙度、水稳性团聚体质量分数和抗剪强度的影响,并结合电镜分析揭示固土机制。结果表明:1)黏合剂显著降低土壤密度(P < 0.05),砂土中PVA降幅(6.8%~10.3%)高于PAM(3.4%~4.8%),粉土中PVA降幅(11.7%~13.1%)也高于PAM(10.3%~11.7%),PVA效果更好;2)黏合剂能显著提升土壤孔隙度(P < 0.05),且PVA提升效果比PAM更显著,但各掺量间无显著差异(P > 0.05);3)黏合剂显著提高大团聚体质量分数(P < 0.05),增强土壤团聚体稳定性,PAM的掺量效应更明显;4)黏合剂改良土体的主应力差峰值随围压增加符合摩尔−库伦定律,砂土强度提升优于粉土,在0.4%~0.6%时达到最佳效果。且改良后2种土壤内聚力均提升,但内摩擦角呈现不同响应:砂土随掺量增加呈递减趋势,粉土无显著改善(P > 0.05);5)黏合剂通过聚集小团聚体、形成牵丝连结及表面片状结构增强土体稳定性。黏合剂能显著改善土壤物理性质和力学性能,为提高喷播基材的稳定性和抗侵蚀能力提供理论支撑,有助于减少水土流失并促进生态恢复。

       

      Abstract:
      Background When conducting ecological restoration of sandy and silty soil slopes in Dongcaoying village, Baodaoling town, Yanqing district, Beijing, issues such as substrate detachment, slope sliding and soil erosion occurred, resulting in poor stability of the restoration. Currently, the influence of different adhesive agent types and dosages on the properties of the substrate is not clear, and further research is needed to optimize the ecological restoration plan and enhance the stability of the slope.
      Methods This study took sandy soil and silt soil as the research objects and conducted indoor experiments to explore the effects of polyacrylamide (PAM) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) at dosages of 0 (control group, CK), 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, and 0.8% (w/w) on soil density, porosity, the mass fraction of water-stable aggregates, and shear strength. The soil solidification mechanism was also revealed through electron microscopy analysis.
      Results 1) The adhesives significantly reduced soil bulk density (P < 0.05). The reduction in PVA (6.8%−10.3%) was higher than that of PAM (3.4%−4.8%) in sandy soil, and the reduction in PVA (11.7%−13.1%) was also higher than that of PAM (10.3%−11.7%) in silty soil. The effect of PVA was better. 2) The adhesives significantly increased soil porosity (P < 0.05), and the improvement effect of PVA was more significant than that of PAM, but there was no significant difference among the dosages (P > 0.05). 3) The adhesives significantly increased the mass fraction of large aggregates (P < 0.05), enhanced the stability of soil aggregates, and the effect of PAM dosage was more obvious. 4) The peak value of the principal stress difference of the soil modified by the adhesive increases in accordance with the Mohr-Coulomb law as the confining pressure increases. The strength improvement of sandy soil is better than that of silt soil, and the optimal effect is achieved at a range of 0.4% to 0.6%. Moreover, the cohesion of both types of soil increases after modification, but the internal friction angle shows different responses: the cohesion of sandy soil decreases with the increase of the admixture content, while there is no significant improvement in silt soil (P > 0.05). 5) The adhesives enhanced the stability of the soil body by aggregating small aggregates, forming thread connections and surface sheet-like structures.
      Conclusions PAM and PVA have significant effects on improving the physical and mechanical properties of soil. The optimal dosage is clearly 0.4%−0.6%. The results can provide theoretical support for the differences in the application effects of adhesives in different soil types, and are of great guiding value for reducing soil erosion and promoting ecological restoration projects.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回