高级检索

    共和盆地变电站建设干扰区土壤改良剂添加对土壤细菌群落结构的影响

    Impact of soil amendment application on soil bacterial community structure in the disturbed desert soils around power substation construction zone in the Gonghe Basin

    • 摘要: 针对干旱荒漠区输电变电站等工程建设造成的剧烈土壤退化,探究有机肥与复合菌剂等土壤改良剂的修复效能,对重构受损土壤微生物生态功能、恢复生态系统自我维持能力及保障区域生态安全具有关键意义。研究聚焦共和盆地荒漠化地区输电变电站建设干扰土壤,结合田间实验和高通量测序技术,探究有机肥与复合菌剂对土壤微生物生态的调控作用。结果表明,(1)两种改良剂均显著提升了微生物量碳、微生物量氮、土壤有机、总氮、水解氮及β-葡萄糖苷酶、亮氨酸氨基肽酶活性,同时显著降低土壤pH、速效及Ca²⁺、Mg²⁺含量。(2)细菌群落分析显示,有机肥显著富集放线菌门(Actinobacteria)、绿弯菌门(Chloroflexi)和超微细菌联合门(Patescibacteria),而复合菌剂则富集芽单胞菌门(Gemmatimonadetes)、变形菌门(Proteobacteria)和绿弯菌门(Chloroflexi),二者均显著抑制酸杆菌门(Acidobacteria)和拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)。改良剂显著提高了细菌丰度与α多样性,且群落结构发生显著分化(R² = 0.332, P < 0.001)。(3)共现网络分析揭示,处理后网络模块化程度、平均聚类系数及负相关连接比例显著升高,平均路径长度与接近中心性显著降低,呈现典型的“小世界”拓扑特征,群落稳健性增强。(4)Mantel检验证实细菌群落结构与微生物量碳、微生物量氮及关键酶活性高度相关(r > 0.7, P < 0.01);有机肥处理区群落主要受有机碳与速效氮驱动,而复合菌剂区则受总钾、速效磷与速效钾等多因子协同驱动。本研究首次在荒漠化工程扰动区揭示土壤改良剂通过物理化学改良与微生物驱动双重路径,协同重塑细菌群落结构、增强功能活性及网络稳定性的机制,为干旱区工程迹地生态修复提供了重要的微生物学依据和靶向调控策略。

       

      Abstract: Background Infrastructure development, such as power‐transmission substations, is widely recognised as causing severe soil degradation in arid desert regions. However, evaluating the remediation efficacy of soil amendments—namely organic fertilizer and composite microbial inoculants—is crucial for reconstructing impaired soil microbial ecological functions, restoring ecosystem self-maintenance capacity, and safeguarding regional ecological security. Methods In this study, we evaluated the remediation efficacy of organic fertilizer and microbial inoculant on degraded soils under desert power-transmission substation construction in the Gonghe Basin, combining field trials with high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results (1) Both amendments markedly increased microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, hydrolyzable nitrogen, β-glucosidase, and leucine-aminopeptidase activities while significantly reducing soil pH, available phosphorus, and Ca²⁺/Mg²⁺ concentrations. (2) Organic fertilizer treatments enriched Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Patescibacteria, whereas microbial inoculant favored Gemmatimonadetes, Proteobacteria, and Chloroflexi; both amendments suppressed Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes. These treatments also significantly elevated bacterial richness and α‐diversity, with PERMANOVA confirming distinct community structures among treatments (R² = 0.332, P < 0.001). (3) Co-occurrence network analysis revealed increased modularity, clustering coefficient, and negative correlation proportion, alongside reduced average path length and closeness centrality, characteristic of a “small-world” topology and enhanced community robustness. (4) Mantel tests demonstrated strong correlations between bacterial community structure and microbial biomass C/N and key enzyme activities (r > 0.7, P < 0.01), with organic fertilizer‐driven communities primarily influenced by organic C and available N, while inoculant-treated soils were shaped by total K, available P, and available K. Conclusions This study reveals, in a desertified engineering disturbance context, that soil amendments synergistically reconstruct bacterial community structure, boost functional activity, and stabilize network architecture via both physicochemical improvement and targeted microbial interventions, thereby providing critical microbial‐based strategies for ecological restoration in arid infrastructure zones.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回