高级检索

    滇中亚高山草甸开挖裸露坡面侵蚀水动力研究

    Research on the Erosion Hydrodynamics of the Excavated Bare Slope in the Alpine Meadow of Central Yunnan

    • 摘要: 摘 要:【目的】为揭示工程开挖导致的亚高山草甸淋溶层与母质层裸露坡面在不同坡度条件下的水动力特征差异,阐明其侵蚀动力机制。【方法】采用室内模拟降雨试验(90 mm/h),系统测定8°、15°、25°坡度下两类坡面的径流水动力参数(Re、Fr、τ、f、ω)及侵蚀速率(Dr),解析坡度对其侵蚀过程的影响规律。【结果】(1)母质层Re在8°和25°坡较淋溶层分别降低25.2%和16.6%;Fr呈现坡度依赖性变化(8°降41.9%,25°升22.7%);τ在8°坡增加12.4%而在25°坡降低35.6%。(2)母质层f在8°坡显著增加164.8%导致Dr提高23.3%,但在25°坡f降低42.1%使Dr增幅(104%)显著低于淋溶层(257%)。(3)侵蚀规律:淋溶层Dr随坡度呈单调递增(8.44—30.17 g.m⁻².min⁻¹),而母质层在≥15°坡时Dr转为低于淋溶层。【结论】径流功率(ω)是侵蚀预测的最优指标(淋溶层R²=0.96,母质层R²=0.91);母质层侵蚀存在临界坡度转折(8°侵蚀占优,),且≥15°抗蚀相对较强,侵蚀速率随坡度增加的增幅显著弱于淋溶层。

       

      Abstract: Abstract:【Objective】To reveal the differences in hydrodynamic characteristics between eluvial horizons and parent material horizons of subalpine meadows caused by engineering excavation under different slope gradients, and to clarify their erosion dynamic mechanisms. 【Method】 Indoor simulated rainfall experiments (90 mm/h) were conducted to systematically determine runoff hydrodynamic parameters (Re, Fr, τ, f, ω) and erosion rate (Dr) on two types of slopes under 8°, 15°, and 25° gradients, and to analyze the influence of slope gradient on the erosion process. 【Results】(1) Response of hydrodynamic parameters: The Reynolds number (Re) of the parent material horizon was 25.2% and 16.6% lower than that of the eluvial horizon at 8° and 25° slopes, respectively; the Froude number (Fr) showed slope-dependent changes (decreasing by 41.9% at 8° and increasing by 22.7% at 25°); the shear stress (τ) increased by 12.4% at 8° slope but decreased by 35.6% at 25° slope. (2) Erosion dynamic characteristics: The resistance coefficient (f) of the parent material horizon increased significantly by 164.8% at 8° slope, leading to a 23.3% increase in Dr; however, at 25° slope, f decreased by 42.1%, resulting in a Dr increase (104%) that was significantly lower than that of the eluvial horizon (257%). (3) Erosion patterns: The Dr of the eluvial horizon showed a monotonically increasing trend with slope gradient (8.44–30.17 g.m⁻².min⁻¹), while the Dr of the parent material horizon became lower than that of the eluvial horizon when the slope was ≥15°. 【Conclusion】Runoff power (ω) is the optimal index for erosion prediction (R²=0.96 for the eluvial horizon and R²=0.91 for the parent material horizon); the erosion of the parent material horizon has a critical slope threshold transition (erosion dominates at 8°, and erosion resistance enhances at ≥15°), and the eluvial horizon is more sensitive to slope gradient changes.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回