高级检索

    基于多模型的雅鲁藏布江流域降雨侵蚀力时空特征

    Spatiotemporal characteristics of rainfall erosivity in Yarlung Zangbo River Basin based on multiple models

    • 摘要:
      目的 雅鲁藏布江流域是典型的高寒生态脆弱区,其复杂的气候分异对降雨侵蚀力R模型适用性提出更高要求。
      方法 基于25个气象站1980—2020年逐日降雨量数据,应用9种典型简易模型(A~I)计算R值。通过Mann-Kendall检验、Sen's斜率分析及层次聚类法,系统分析模型差异及其在各气候区站点的表现。
      结果 1) 各模型计算的多年平均R值差异明显(101 ~ 1677 MJ·mm/(hm2·h)),模型B、C、E较模型D、F、G计算数值偏大;模型I在各气候区站点均无异常值。2) 各模型R值年际变化方向一致,均在2005年前后检测到极显著突变点(P < 0.01);多数站点呈上升趋势,但不同模型估计的趋势幅度差异明显。3) 模型聚为3组:组1(A, B, C, E, F, G)、组2(D)和组3(H, I);各组对气候响应的敏感度排序为:组3 > 组1 > 组2,该差异在半干旱和半湿润区尤为显著(P < 0.01)。
      结论 不同模型在估算绝对值、变化幅度及局部趋势上存在显著差异,模型A、H和I在流域内有较好的应用潜力。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective The Yarlung Zangbo River Basin is a typical alpine ecologically fragile region, where complex climatic differentiation poses higher requirements for the selection of rainfall erosivity (R) models. Therefore, evaluating the applicability and differences among simplified R models is essential for accurately characterizing the spatiotemporal variation of rainfall erosivity and for supporting appropriate model selection in this region.
      Methods Daily rainfall data from 25 meteorological stations across the Yarlung Zangbo River Basin from 1980 to 2020 were used as input for nine typical simplified models (A-I) to calculate R values. Model differences and their performance at stations across climatic zones were evaluated using the Mann-Kendall test, Sen's slope estimator, and hierarchical clustering analysis.
      Results 1) The multi-year average R values estimated by the nine models varied substantially, ranging from 101 to 1 677 MJ·mm/(hm2·h). Models B, C, and E generally produced higher estimates than models D, F, and G, while model I showed no outliers at stations across all climatic zones. 2) All models exhibited consistent directions of interannual variations in R and detected highly significant abrupt change points around 2005 (P < 0.01). Most stations showed increasing trends, but the magnitudes of the estimated trends varied markedly among models. 3) The models were clustered into three groups: Group 1 (A, B, C, E, F, G), Group 2 (D), and Group 3 (H, I). The sensitivity to climate variability was ranked as Group 3 (highest) > Group 1 > Group 2 (lowest), with particularly pronounced differences in semi-arid and semi-humid zones (P < 0.01).
      Conclusions The findings demonstrate that simplified rainfall erosivity models differ significantly in estimating absolute values, variation amplitudes, and local trends of R. This study evaluates the model applicability and provides a scientific basis for selecting appropriate rainfall erosivity models for soil-erosion assessment in the cold, high-altitude and ecologically fragile areas of the Yarlung Zangbo River Basin.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回