高级检索

    露天煤矿排土场土壤改良与植被覆盖对边坡的产流产沙的影响

    Effects of soil improvement and vegetation cover on runoff and sediment yield from the slopes of open-pit coal mine waste dumps

    • 摘要: 背景煤矿排土场边坡土壤结构松散且水肥保持力差,植被覆盖对水土流失影响关键。为探究植被覆盖度与土壤改良对寒区草原露天煤矿排土场边坡水土流失的协同控制效应,评价矿区现存土壤改良措施的水土保持效果。方法本研究采用人工模拟降雨试验,分析了不同羊草+紫苜蓿植被覆盖度(0%、30%、60%和90%)与土壤改良措施(2%的陶粒、0.4%的微生物菌剂和5%的风化煤均匀混合或喷洒在原表土中)对边坡在不同降雨强度(30 mm/h、40 mm/h、50 mm/h、60 mm/h)下的产流产沙规律的影响。结果1)排土场边坡产流率均随降雨历时呈“先增后稳”规律,产流率随植被覆盖度提升显著降低,90% 覆盖度产流率仅为裸坡的 1/5~1/3;土壤改良可有效抑制产流,中高雨强下(≥40mm/h) 90% 覆盖度改良坡面总产流量较未改良降低 24.4%~27.6%,二者协同可缓冲雨强驱动效应。2)产沙过程分为初期快速增长、中期快速下降、后期稳定3阶段,累计产沙量随植被覆盖度提升显著降低,30mm/h 雨强下 90% 覆盖度未改良坡面产沙量仅为裸地的 4.3%,随降雨强度增大而增加,土壤改良可提升土壤抗蚀性,60% 覆盖度+40mm/h 雨强下坡面产沙量降幅达 28.7%,与植被形成阻沙协同效应。3)累计产沙量与产流量呈显著线性正相关(R²≥0.9021),60% 植被覆盖度是削弱水沙耦合强度的阈值,高覆盖使相同产流量下产沙增量降低 70% 以上,土壤改良可进一步平缓水沙响应关系。4)植被通过冠层截留、根系固持,土壤改良通过优化结构提升入渗能力,二者协同调控效果优于单一措施。结论本研究明确了草原矿区排土场径流-泥沙耦合规律,应用“植被+土壤改良”协同防控体系,达成研究目标,为水土流失精准预测及生态修复提供了技术参数。

       

      Abstract: Background The soil structure on coal mine waste dump slopes is loose with poor water and nutrient retention capacity, making vegetation cover critical to soil erosion control. This study investigates the synergistic effects of vegetation cover and soil improvement measures on controlling soil erosion on slopes of open-pit coal mines in cold-region grasslands, while evaluating the soil conservation effectiveness of existing soil improvement practices in mining areas. Methods This study employed artificial rainfall simulation tests to analysis the combined effects of varying vegetation cover levels (0%, 30%, 60%, and 90%) of Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel. + Medicago sativa L. and soil improvement measures (2% expanded clay aggregate, 0.4% microbial inoculant, and 5% weathered coal uniformly mixed or sprayed onto native topsoil) on runoff and sediment yield patterns at slopes subjected to rainfall intensities of 30 mm/h, 40 mm/h, 50 mm/h, and 60 mm/h. Results 1) Runoff generation rates on waste rock dump slopes exhibited a “initial increase followed by stabilization” pattern with rainfall duration. Vegetation coverage significantly reduced runoff generation rates, with 90% coverage yielding only 1/5 to 1/3 of bare slope runoff; Soil improvement effectively suppressed runoff generation. Under moderate to high rainfall intensities (≥40 mm/h), the total runoff volume on improved slopes with 90% coverage decreased by 24.4%–27.6% compared to unimproved slopes, with both factors synergistically mitigating rainfall intensity effects. 2) Sediment yield exhibited three distinct phases: rapid initial increase, rapid mid-phase decrease, and stable late phase. Cumulative sediment yield significantly decreased with increasing vegetation coverage. At 30 mm/h rainfall intensity, sand yield on unimproved slopes with 90% coverage was only 4.3% of bare land levels, increasing with rainfall intensity. Soil improvement enhances erosion resistance, reducing slope sand yield by 28.7% at 60% coverage + 40 mm/h rainfall intensity, forming a synergistic sand retention effect with vegetation. 3) Cumulative sediment yield exhibited a significant positive linear correlation with runoff volume (R²≥0.9021). Sixty percent vegetation cover served as the threshold for weakening water-sediment coupling intensity. Higher cover reduced incremental sediment yield by over 70% under identical runoff conditions, while soil improvement further moderated the water-sediment response relationship. (4) Vegetation regulates sediment through canopy interception and root retention, while soil improvement enhances infiltration capacity by optimizing structure. Their synergistic effect outperforms individual measures. Conclusions This study clarifies the runoff-sediment coupling patterns in grassland mining waste dumps. The “vegetation + soil improvement” synergistic control system achieves research objectives, providing technical parameters for precise soil erosion prediction and ecological restoration.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回