高级检索

    北京北部山区生态清洁小流域综合效益评价

    Comprehensive evaluation of ecological-economic-social benefits of eco-clean small watersheds in the northern mountainous area of Beijing

    • 摘要: 目的北京北部山区生态清洁小流域对首都的生态安全至关重要。然而,目前缺乏对其系统性综合评价。方法本研究选取2021年立项并实施的怀柔区西栅子小流域、密云区河下小流域及昌平区赴任辛庄小流域为研究对象,构建了涵盖水质提升、生态、经济及社会4项准则层、13项具体指标的综合效益评价体系。研究综合运用层次分析法确定指标权重,采用加权综合指数法量化治理前后效益变化,并引入障碍度模型诊断限制小流域可持续发展的关键障碍因子。结果治理后三条小流域综合效益均有所提升,西栅子、河下与赴任辛庄小流域综合效益增幅分别为19%、16%与8%,均达到初级系统标准。各子系统效益贡献表现为水质提升效益 > 生态效益 > 经济效益 > 社会效益,反映出当前治理以水环境改善与水土保持为核心带动的特征。障碍度诊断表明,生态子系统需重点关注林草覆盖率;经济子系统需着力提升经济产投比与土地生产率;社会子系统中恩格尔系数与乡村从业人员比例是主要制约;水质提升子系统仍需持续控制COD含量。结论本研究验证了该评价体系在北京北部山区的适用性,生态清洁小流域治理有效缓解了区域水环境压力,促进了水土资源合理利用与生态服务质量提升。未来治理应进一步引导农民参与管护,强化生态农业技术推广与产业结构优化,以实现生态保护与社区发展的协同共赢。

       

      Abstract: Objective Ecological clean small watersheds in the northern mountainous areas of Beijing are critical to the ecological security of the capital. However, there is currently a lack of systematic and comprehensive evaluation of their effectiveness. Methods This study focuses on the Xizhazi small watershed (Huairou District), Hexia small watershed (Miyun District), and Furenxinzhuang small watershed (Changping District), all of which were initiated and implemented in 2021. A comprehensive benefit evaluation system was established, comprising four criterion layers—water quality improvement, ecology, economy, and society—and 13 specific indicators. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was employed to determine indicator weights, while the weighted comprehensive index method was used to quantify the changes in benefits before and after management. Furthermore, an obstacle degree model was introduced to diagnose the key factors constraining the sustainable development of these small watersheds. Results The results indicated that the comprehensive benefits of the three small watersheds improved following management, with increases of 19%, 16%, and 8% for Xizhazi, Hexia, and Furenxinzhuang, respectively, all reaching the "primary system" standard. The contribution of subsystems followed the order: water quality improvement > ecology > economy > society, reflecting a management paradigm characterized by water environment enhancement and soil and water conservation as the core drivers. Obstacle diagnosis revealed that: 1) within the ecological subsystem, forest and grass coverage requires prioritized attention; 2) in the economic subsystem, efforts should be directed toward improving the economic input-output ratio and land productivity; 3) in the social subsystem, the Engel coefficient and the proportion of rural employees are the primary constraints; and 4) the water quality subsystem necessitates continued control of Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD).Conclusions This study validates the applicability of the developed evaluation system in the northern mountainous areas of Beijing. The management of ecological clean small watersheds has effectively alleviated regional water environmental pressure and promoted the rational utilization of water and soil resources alongside the enhancement of ecosystem service quality. Future governance should further incentivize farmer participation in maintenance and management, strengthen the promotion of eco-agricultural technologies, and optimize industrial structures to achieve a synergistic win-win for ecological protection and community development.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回