高级检索

    黄土丘陵沟壑区沟谷发育阶段和潜力的差异分析

    Differential analysis of gully development stages and potential in the hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau

    • 摘要: 摘 要:目的探究黄土高原丘陵沟壑区的沟谷发育阶段和潜力,比较其区域差异性,可为黄土高原沟蚀防治和水土保持提供科学依据。方法选取黄土高原丘陵沟壑区南北样线上7个典型样区,涵盖82个靠近分水岭的微流域,基于无人机高精度地形数据,采用面积高程积分法量化沟谷地貌发育阶段,结合地貌阈值法分析沟谷发育潜力,探讨其在南北方向的变化规律。结果(1)黄土高原丘陵沟壑区沿南北样线的微流域沟谷发育呈“中部高活性、南北受控或分化”格局,中部沟间地面积比例小,沟谷系统下切活性强;南北两端沟间地比例大,平均坡度平缓,系统处于相对稳定状态,仅局地表现出较高活跃性。(2)面积高程积分值(HI)自北向南呈“大—小—大”的趋势,北部和南部85%的微流域处于沟谷发育的壮年期;面积高程积分曲线以S型为主,沟谷发育处于下切与扩展阶段。(3)坡度–面积(S–A)关系分析表明耕地微流域沟谷汇水区面积大于林地微流域,具有更大的发育潜力;采取措施改变沟缘线的局部坡度能够降低沟谷发育的潜力。结论证实了微流域尺度下形态学指标(HI)与动力学指标(阈值)的耦合有效性,表明黄土高原丘陵沟壑区处于地貌的发育壮年期,地貌发育越成熟,沟谷发育越活跃、潜力越大。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: Objective The hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau is one of the most erosion-prone areas in China, where gully erosion plays an important role in landscape dissection, sediment production, and land degradation. Although previous studies have examined gully morphology and distribution at regional, hillslope, and individual-gully scales, gully developmental stage and potential at the micro-watershed scale remain poorly understood, especially along the north-south transect. Therefore, this study aimed to quantify gully developmental stages and development potential in typical micro-watersheds, compare their spatial differences along the transect, and provide a basis for gully erosion control and soil and water conservation on the Loess Plateau. Methods A total of 82 typical micro-watersheds near drainage divides were selected from seven representative sampling areas along a north-south transect in the hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau. High-resolution topographic data were obtained using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry, and 1 m digital elevation models (DEMs) were generated through aerial triangulation, point-cloud filtering, and terrain reconstruction. Gully edge lines were delineated by visual interpretation based on DEMs, slope maps, hillshade maps, and high-resolution orthophotos. The areas and mean slopes of gully land and interfluve land were then extracted for each micro-watershed. Gully developmental stage was quantified using the hypsometric integral (HI) and hypsometric curves, while gully development potential was evaluated using slope-area (S-A) threshold analysis. To assess the influence of land use, the micro-watersheds were further classified into cropland-dominated and woodland-dominated types according to the dominant land use in the interfluve area, and separate threshold relationships were established in logarithmic space. Results (1) Micro-watersheds along the transect exhibit a distinct pattern of “high activity in the central sector and constrained or differentiated conditions in the northern and southern sectors.” The central sector is characterized by a smaller interfluve-area proportion and stronger gully incision activity, whereas the northern and southern sectors show larger interfluve-area proportions and gentler mean slopes, indicating relatively stable systems with only localized high-activity units. (2) HI values display a “high–low–high” trend from north to south; 85% of micro-watersheds in the northern and southern sectors are in the mature stage. Hypsometric curves are predominantly S-shaped, indicating a stage dominated by active incision and lateral expansion. (3) Slope–area (S–A) analysis indicates that cropland-dominated micro-watersheds have larger contributing (drainage) areas than woodland-dominated ones, implying higher development potential; moreover, management measures that reduce local slope gradients adjacent to gully edges can lower gully development potential. Conclusions Coupling HI with the S-A threshold provides an effective framework for evaluating gully developmental stage and potential at the micro-watershed scale. Overall, the hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau is mainly in a mature geomorphic stage, with clear spatial differentiation along the north-south transect. The central region shows stronger incision activity and geomorphic adjustment, whereas the northern and southern regions retain larger interfluve areas and more heterogeneous developmental conditions. In general, more advanced geomorphic development is associated with more active gully development and greater potential, providing a scientific basis for identifying priority areas for gully erosion control and developing region-specific soil and water conservation strategies.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回