高级检索

    内蒙古城市气候承载力的时空演化特征及其驱动机制研究

    Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Mechanisms of Urban Climate Carrying Capacity in Inner Mongolia

    • 摘要: 以内蒙古自治区12个盟市为研究对象,基于压力-状态-响应(PSR)框架,构建涵盖气候天然容量、极端气候事件压力、城市气候压力与城市协调发展能力的气候承载力评价体系,利用2003-2023年多源数据分析其时空演化特征。进一步通过Spearman相关分析与共线性诊断筛选关键驱动因子,引入多种机器学习模型并结合SHAP方法解析驱动效应。结果表明:(1)研究期内气候承载力呈阶段性波动,由状态改善、压力缓释与响应修复协同驱动,空间上表现为中西部较高、东部较低,区域差异有所收敛但总体格局稳定;(2)随机森林模型预测性能最优,日照时数、科技经费支出占比、人口密度、第三产业占比、环境保护投资及人均日综合生活用水量为关键驱动因素;(3)驱动机制具有显著区域异质性,资源型与生态脆弱区对科技与治理投入更敏感,人口与产业集聚区受资源约束更强,生态约束区在产业扩张与气候因子叠加下更易出现调节能力弱化。研究结果为干旱半干旱区实施差异化气候适应与承载调控提供科学依据。

       

      Abstract: Taking the 12 prefecture-level cities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region as the study area, this study constructs a climate carrying capacity evaluation framework based on the Pressure–State–Response (PSR) model, incorporating climate natural capacity, extreme climate event pressure, urban climate pressure, and urban coordinated development capacity. Using multi-source data from 2003 to 2023, the spatiotemporal evolution of urban climate carrying capacity is systematically analyzed. Key driving factors are further identified through Spearman correlation analysis and multicollinearity diagnostics, and multiple machine-learning models are compared, with SHAP applied to interpret the direction, magnitude, and regional heterogeneity of driving effects. The results indicate that: (1) climate carrying capacity exhibits pronounced stage-wise fluctuations over the study period, jointly driven by state improvement, pressure alleviation, and response restoration; spatially, higher levels are observed in central and western Inner Mongolia and lower levels in the eastern region, with regional disparities gradually narrowing while the overall pattern remains stable; (2) the random forest model demonstrates the best predictive performance, identifying sunshine duration, the proportion of science and technology expenditure, population density, the share of the tertiary industry, environmental protection investment, and per capita daily comprehensive domestic water use as key drivers; and (3) driving mechanisms display significant regional heterogeneity, with resource-based and ecologically fragile areas being more sensitive to technological and governance inputs, highly urbanized and industrialized areas being more constrained by resource pressure, and ecologically constrained regions being more prone to weakened climate regulation capacity under the combined effects of industrial expansion and climatic factors. These findings provide scientific support for differentiated climate adaptation and carrying capacity regulation strategies in arid and semi-arid regions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回