高级检索

    林分密度对华北落叶松人工林土壤团聚体稳定性的影响

    The effect of stand density on soil aggregate stability in planted Larix gmelinii forests in North China

    • 摘要: 目的 探究不同林分密度下华北落叶松人工林土壤团聚体稳定性的变化规律及其与土壤理化性质的关系,为人工林密度调控和土壤质量提升提供依据。方法 本研究以内蒙古旺业甸林场低密度(LT,658±122株·hm⁻²)、中密度(MT,1144±34株·hm⁻²)和高密度(HT,1800±238株·hm⁻²)华北落叶松人工林为对象,采集0~20 cm土层土壤,采用干筛法和湿筛法测定团聚体组成及稳定性指标,并测定土壤理化性质;采用方差分析、协方差分析和Pearson相关分析进行统计检验,其中以坡度作为协变量控制地形差异的影响。结果 (1)MT林分的土壤团聚体稳定性最高,其水稳定性团聚体的平均重量直径(1.66±0.73mm)和几何平均直径(1.55±0.60mm)较低密度(LT)分别提升45.6%和39.6%,团聚体破碎率(24.89%±4.50%)和分形维数(3.40±0.20)均为最低;(2)各密度梯度间土壤颗粒组成无显著差异。不同林分密度间土壤养分含量存在差异,LT林分的SOC含量(40.39±11.38g·kg-1)高于MT林分(26.43±4.69g·kg-1)和HT林分(29.67±4.48g·kg-1),但Pearson相关分析显示SOC、TN、TP与土壤团聚体稳定性指标均无显著相关性(P>0.05)。结论 在本研究设置的3个密度梯度中,中密度林分土壤团聚体稳定性总体较高,而SOC、TN和TP总量不能充分解释其变化,表明团聚体稳定性还可能受到根系、微生物及有机质组分等因素的共同调控。

       

      Abstract: Background Stand density is an important management factor affecting soil structure and functioning in plantations. This study aimed to determine how soil aggregate stability responds to different stand densities in Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr plantations and to clarify the relationships between aggregate stability and major soil physicochemical properties, thereby providing a scientific basis for stand-density regulation and soil quality improvement in plantation management. Methods The study was conducted in L. principis-rupprechtii plantations at Wangyedian Forest Farm, Inner Mongolia, China. Three stand-density levels were selected: low density (LT, 658±122 trees·hm⁻²), medium density (MT, 1 144±34 trees·hm⁻²), and high density (HT, 1 800±238 trees·hm⁻²). Soil samples were collected from the 0–20 cm layer. Dry sieving and wet sieving were used to determine the size distribution of soil aggregates and to evaluate their mechanical and water stability, respectively. Aggregate stability was characterized using indices including mean weight diameter, geometric mean diameter, percentage of aggregate destruction, and fractal dimension. Major soil physicochemical properties, including soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP), were also determined. Analysis of variance was used to examine differences among stand-density treatments. To account for potential topographic heterogeneity among plots, analysis of covariance was further conducted with stand density as the fixed effect and slope as a covariate. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the relationships between soil physicochemical properties and aggregate-stability indices. Results (1) Soil aggregate stability was highest in the MT stands. The mean weight diameter of water-stable aggregates were 1.66±0.73mm and 1.55±0.60mm), respectively, representing increases of 45.6% and 39.6% relative to the LTnstands. The aggregate breakdown percentage and fractal dimension were lowest in the MT stands, at 24.89%±4.50% and 3.40±0.20, respectively. (2) Soil particle-size distribution did not differ significantly among the three stand density levels. Soil nutrient contents varied among stand densities. Soil organic carbon (SOC) content was higher in the LT stands (40.39±11.38g·kg-1) than that of MT (26.43±4.69g·kg-1) and HT (29.67±4.48g·kg-1). Howerever, Pearson correlation analysis showed no significant correlation between soil aggregate stability indices and SOC, total nitrogen (TN), or total phosphorus (TP) contents (P>0.05). Conclusions Among the three stand densities examined, the medium-density plantation, approximately 1 144 trees·hm⁻², exhibited relatively high soil aggregate stability. The lack of significant relationships between aggregate stability and SOC, TN, or TP suggests that variation in aggregate stability cannot be adequately explained by bulk nutrient contents alone and may also be regulated by root traits, microbial activity, and organic-matter composition.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回