高级检索

    耕地保护经济补偿方式的农户选择响应———以成都市为例

    Farmers’ selection response to the economic compensationpattern for the cultivated land preservation scheme:A case study of Chengdu City

    • 摘要: 补偿方式选择是耕地保护经济补偿机制设计的重要环节,对耕地保护目标的实现、项目实施的可持续性以及农户的生产生活均具有重要影响。 四川省成都市是我国试行耕地保护经济补偿政策的典型地区,研究其耕地保护补偿方式的农户选择响应对提升耕地保护经济补偿政策效率具有重要意义。 通过对成都市双流县和崇州市的223户农民进行访谈调研,采用多元无序 Logistic 模型分析农户参与耕地保护经济补偿的方式选择及影响因素,得到主要结论如下:1)分别有47.9%和39.1%的受访农户愿意选择形式简单、操作便捷的货币补偿及成都市正在实施的统一购买养老保险的补偿方式,仅有13%的农户愿意选择实物补偿、技术(智力)补偿、政策补偿等方式。 2)兼业程度及家庭收入水平越高的农户家庭更倾向于选择统一购买养老保险或政策、智力补偿等非货币类补偿方式,以务农为主且家庭收入水平较低的农户则相对愿意接受直接的货币补偿,而政策了解程度以及农田生态功能认知水平对农户耕地保护经济补偿方式的选择影响并不显著。 3)农户土地流转行为影响其对补偿方式的选择,参与土地流转的农民更偏好于具有持续性、保障性强的统一购买养老保险的补偿方式。

       

      Abstract: The selection of compensation pattern is one of the most important processes in the design of economic compensation for cultivated land preservation mechanism, which would also contribute to the achievement of cultivated land preservation and the sustainability of the project. On the other hand, from the perspective of farmers in the project area, the selection of compensation pattern would bring important impact on their enthusiasm of agricultural production activities and the improvement of welfare. Besides,from a national perspective, as a typical pilot area of economic compensation for cultivated land preservation in China, Chengdu's experience in economic compensation for cultivated land preservation would exert important significance for the promotion of this scheme in other areas. So, through there search of farmers' reaction to the policy in Chengdu, we can provide a reference for improving the efficiency of economic compensation for cultivated land preservation scheme. In this paper, based on the investigation of 223 households in Shuangliu and Congzhou areas, two important districts in central Chengdu, the multinomial logistic model (MNL) was used to analyze the preference and the factors offarmers' behavior when they participated in the economic compensation for cultivated land preservationscheme, and farmers' characteristics, households' characteristics, agricultural production characteristics and farmers' perception characteristics were chosen as four main independent variables to measure thedegree of influence on the compensation pattern. The conclusions are as follows: 1) Farmers have astrong preference for the monetary compensation and endowment or agricultural insurance compensation,which account for 47.4% and 39.6% of the total samples respectively, because they think these twopatterns are more convenient and securer than other patterns. Comparatively, the inclination to other patterns is relatively weak, such as the material compensation, technological ( intelligence )compensation, policy compensation and so on, which only accounts for 13% of all the samples. 2) The multinomial logistic model result shows that, farmers' selection preference changes with the attribute of their educational level, age, economic conditions, agricultural production characteristics and their perception for the scheme. Other factors such as the population structure, number of farming and off-farmlabors, arable land size, economics and the proportion of non-agricultural income all have significant influence on the selection of compensation pattern. However, farmers' perception for agricultural policyand their understanding of farmland ecological function are not significant in the model. 3) Farmers' features of land transfer have important effects on the choice of compensation pattern. That is to say,farmers, who are involved in land transfer, have a stronger preference to the endowment insurance compensation pattern, for the reason that they think endowment insurance compensation pattern is more sustainable and affordable when they get old.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回