高级检索

    基于生态-生产-生活协同的小流域分类方法与实证

    Classification of small watershed based on ecology-production-living: Method and empirical study

    • 摘要: 新时代水土保持工作要求因地制宜、实施分类指导, 促进小流域生态、生产、生活协同发展。立足于生态保护与生产-生活功能发展的协同关系, 采用层次分析法、逐级判别法等建模方法, 开展小流域分类方法与实证研究。主要结果如下: 1)提出小流域二级分类体系, 一级类从生态安全出发, 分为生态高敏感型、中敏感型和低敏感型, 二级类以生产-生活主导功能为依据, 分为产业集聚型、绿色发展型、城镇宜居型、美丽乡村型、景观休闲型和生态保育型。2)从生态、生产、生活3个维度确定14项指标, 构建小流域分类的生态敏感性多准则判别模型和生产-生活主导功能逐级判别模型。3)对江苏省3909条小流域进行分类, 一级类中生态低敏感型占62.98%;二级类中绿色发展型、生态保育型和景观休闲型分别占23.92%、23.10%和20.13%, 美丽乡村型和城镇宜居型分别占17.32%和10.69%, 产业集聚型仅占4.83%。实地调研发现, 分类结果符合小流域实际状况, 针对各类型小流域提出的综合治理主导方向与发展重点可为小流域分类建设提供科学依据。

       

      Abstract:
      Background  With the aim to support coordinated development of ecology, production and living, which is the requirement of soil and water conservation in the New Era, it is necessary to classify the small watersheds into different categories and implement targeted guidance according to local conditions. Current studies on small watershed classification were mainly focusing on the differences of small watersheds in natural conditions and requirements for soil and water conservation, while the synergic relationship between ecological protection and development of production and living condition was not fully considered.
      Methods  This paper proposed a small watershed classification system in consideration of both ecological conservation and development of production-living functions. Analytic hierarchy process and step-by-step judgment method were adopted to identify the category of small watershed according to a set of indicators that were selected through literature research. In order to validate the feasibility of the proposed small watershed classification system, an empirical study was conducted in Jiangsu province using data achieved from dynamic monitoring of regional soil and water loss, as well as data collected from public report on natural environment and social-economic development.
      Results  1) A two-level small watershed classification system was proposed. The first-level categories, namely high ecological sensitivity, medium ecological sensitivity and low ecological sensitivity were classified based on ecological security. The second level categories, namely industry agglomeration, green development, urban livable, beautiful village, landscape leisure and ecological conservation, were classified based on the dominant function in production and living. 2) With 14 indicators selected in consideration of ecology, production and living, a multi-criteria decision model of ecological sensitivity and a progressive decision model of dominant function in production and living were constructed respectively. 3) The proposed method was applied to classify the 3909 small watersheds in Jiangsu province as an empirical study. As for the first level classification, the category of low ecological sensitivity was the majority, accounting for 62.98%. As for the second level classification, categories of green development, ecological conservation and landscape leisure accounted for 23.92%, 23.10% and 20.13% respectively, followed by the categories of beautiful village and urban livable, accounting for 17.32% and 10.69%. The category of industry agglomeration was less, accounting for 4.83%.
      Conclusions  The small watershed classification method based on ecology-production-living can comprehensively reflect the small watershed characteristics in terms of ecological protection and dominant production-living function. The proposed leading direction and priority of development for comprehensive management of each categories of small watershed could provide a scientific basis for the classified construction of small watersheds.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回